Tag Archives: sage-grouse

Undergraduate Research Opportunties

Posted on by
Reply

Now that we’re back from our field research on the sage-grouse in Wyoming, we are turning our attention to the rest of the year in Davis. Towards that end, we would like to invite motivated students to join our lab this summer to participate in our research. These projects would involve measuring behaviors of male and female sage-grouse using videos of courtship interactions on the lek. Other projects may involve analyzing vocalizations using multichannel sound recordings we collected this spring. Either way, it’s a good chance enjoy some Storer Hall air conditioning while participating in exciting projects.

If you are interested, email me, and I can provide more information. The next step would be to attend an information session to answer your questions. We hope to have one or more of these within the next week or two.

For more information, please see the links provided at the top of the “Undergraduate Research Page”

 

2013 Season Recap

Posted on by
Reply

(note- I began writing this entry in the first week in May but finally had time to finish and post it today).

Our wonderful field crew departed yesterday (thank you again Elena, Kate, Christa, Max, and Hannah! You guys were fantastic!), which leaves Gail, Anna and I to finish up things in the field, pack up the camp, and look back on our 2013 field season.

The 2013 crew- exploring a cave in Sinks Canyon. Photo: GLP

Data Proofing. Photo A. Perry

The end of our time in Wyoming always involves proofing data– teams of two people check each line of data in the computer against the field notes to look for typos and other problems. No matter how conscientious one is, mistakes always creep in (especially when one gets up at 4 in the morning!)  Reading each line aloud and filtering data to make sure there are no o’s masquerading as zeros for example, are important ways to insure data quality.

 

 

Waiting to send out the robots. Photo: GLP

In some respects it was a disappointing season, with some of the least cooperative weather we’ve ever encountered. We had repeated cycles of snow every week or two that delayed or prevented meeting some of our field goals. We didn’t have time at the end of the season to run the full suite of robot experiments that we wanted to, so those will be saved for another year. We also didn’t get our sage chemical sampling in, although this was partly a data quality concern (since the sage are producing their ephemeral “summer” leaves now, our results wouldn’t tell us as much about grouse foraging in the late winter and early spring).

We did tick off a few important objectives though. Gail’s redesign of the robots work great- in our tests on the lek they looked good and we didn’t have to mount any “rescues” due to tipping over.  Our crew were instrumental in developing several new protocols ready for next year- including sage sampling, computer-assisted sorting of tail feather “buttprint” photos and moving to a free-ware image analysis program for making those buttprints.

We also got a lot of interesting data from a “bad” year, so we can take a closer look at how environmental variation affects the grouse. Our birds endured a drought; population numbers were really down not only from the high years of 2006 & 2007, but even from last year, so this could have an interesting impact on male traits and behaviors as well as what females like. As Peter and Rosemary Grant showed with their seminal work on Darwin’s Finches in the Galapagos, sometimes you only notice strong selection when times get tough.

As an exciting finale, we finally got two of our new Encounternet telemetry tags, and with Kurt Smith (Ph.D. candidate from the University of Wyoming who is studying Sage-Grouse just southeast from our site), managed to get them on two males from Cottontail.

Male Sage-Grouse with the >30g Encounternet tag. Photo GLP.

After our capture success, we visited Cottontail every morning until our departure to try and test out these new tags. One of our tagged males (male number 641, later called “Talon Krakauer” by our crew), came back to his old territory. We’ll give Kurt a lot of credit for Talon’s return. In our fairly limited experience, birds caught towards the end of the season tend not to return to the lek that season and wait until the next year to strut their stuff. Kurt has put VHF and GPS tags on well over 100 sage-grouse now, so has a good handle on how to make sure the capture and harnessing is as minimally disruptive as possible.

Gail and I monitoring the Encounternet tag while filming the male's behavior

From a blind 40 meters from Talon’s territory, we were able to communicate remotely with Talon’s tag, switch it from the low power mode that that would allow the battery to last until next season to the “streaming” mode that would send real-time accelerometer data from the grouse to our receiver. At the same time we were able to videotape Talon’s behavior. In this way we can correlate the behavior with the movement data coming from the tag. When the birds started looking nervous like they were going to depart the lek for the day, we were able to switch the tag back into the power-saving mode. The GPS sensor on the tag will now come to life every 2 days to take a waypoint, and if all goes well, we will be able to download these points next year and see where Talon ventured throughout the summer and fall.

We will likely do further tests of the accelerometer sensor with chickens back on campus, but we feel much better having some data from an actual sage-grouse in hand.

 

In the home stretch

Posted on by
Reply

A male in the snow at Cottontail Lek.

I’m sitting at my desk, once again watching snow swirl outside the window and listening to the quiet churring of the electric heater. We’ve been getting about one snow storm per week- this is at least the fourth that we’ve had since late March. With the possible exception of Jessica Blickley’s 2009 season out here, we’ve never had this much winter weather, especially this late into the season. It’s often getting legitimately warm by this time in April (daytime highs in the 70’s), but not this year!

With less than two weeks left with the crew, the last few days look to be even more critical than usual. We’ve got a lot of the normal wrap-up still to do- calibrating the array and acoustic localization system, taking down the array, and proofing all of the field data would probably be enough to keep us busy. Add to that some new things for this year including the sagebrush sampling I alluded to in this earlier post, two photo analysis projects, plus all of the video analysis the crew has been doing to identify males on the lek tapes- now our schedule looks positively packed.

Gail snaps a photo of me learning to drive the robot.

Unfortunately this list still leaves off two of our main goals for the season– running our experiments with the robotic female Sage-Grouse, and testing out the encounternet telemetry tags. The robots are finally done, or at least very close to completed, and we are hoping the tags might be shipped to us this week. Once the snow melts, we’ll need to hit the ground running almost literally to practice for the experiments, catch a couple of males, and get all of the other things done. A big storm now could scuttle all of these plans, but thankfully this one seems to be fairly mild, and we may only end up with an inch or two that should hopefully melt quickly once the temperature climbs back above freezing.

The season has definitely been a challenge, and not just because of the weather (although the alternation between snow and mud, with few dry days in the cycle, have been frustrating for us). I mentioned in the mid-season update about the lower numbers of males we’ve had on the leks this year. This has been more than just an issue about monitoring enough birds to allow us to conduct statistical analyses.

Monument Lek, our long-term study lek, reached the point where males were abandoning their territories. We normally collect data on the whole lek at once, with video cameras filming all the males, and our field technicians adding notes of field locations so we can figure out which male is where on the video screen. We also place microphones in locations across the lek in order to record all the males simultaneously. Neither of these methods works very well when the males pull up stakes and display from different areas every day!

We have had to be flexible this year and change our strategy on Monument Lek. Rather than a “record everything” approach, we have shifted to a focal male approach, where every morning we’ve tried to target a few of the males displaying around the lek for video and audio recording. We’ve managed, for at least two or three days, to measure strut rates and get sounds from most of the “regulars” that stuck around the lek for the last half of the season. We also have some mating success data for these males. Although it isn’t ideal, we will have at least some continuity with our previous data for this lek.

My last view of a grouse on Monument Lek this year may be one of these guys displaying in the sage far from the main clearing.

It’s hard to know what caused such a dramatic change on this lek, but I do have one (very speculative) hypothesis: lack of water. The main lek area features a prone tractor tire that is used as a water trough for the summer cattle. In most years, there is a puddle surrounding this tire, and sage-grouse of both sexes would visit this. Most females visiting the lek would walk from the northern corner down to the tire for a drink, and many of the top guys’ territories would either be near the tire or along this path of movement.

This explanation would fall under the hotspot hypothesis for lek evolution. This is one of several hypotheses put forward for why males would cluster together on a lek rather than pursuing other mating strategies such as, for example, remaining with one or more females (like most birds). The idea is that males are able to assess where the density of females is likely to be highest and several males will settle there. If there is a resource drawing the females in, they aren’t defending the resource itself, but instead are taking advantage of an area of increased female traffic.

There Will Be Mud

Posted on by
2

Wyoming weather is still keeping us on our toes. After bouncing from lows around 10 to warm nights in the 40’s and 50’s at the end of March, we thought we might be back on track for another warm year like last year. Not so fast! A small winter storm became a big one, and we ended up with more than a foot of snow earlier this week. I’m not sure we’ve kept records, but this was probably the second or third biggest snowfall I’ve seen since I’ve been out here.

The biggest was in 2007, I think a day or two after the Pangolin Pictures/PBS crew wrapped up filming, when we got closer to 3 feet of snow. That hit right in the peak of breeding, and we were shut out of Monument Lek for at least 3 days. For our 2013 storm, the peak in breeding had pretty well wound down, so a day or two absent from the lek didn’t feel like the end of the world for us. It did lead to one of those stunningly beautiful mornings we get out here. I think a snowy dawn is a close second to a Wind River moonset as my favorite events out here.

The storm started on Monday, and on Tuesday, we headed into town early due to frozen pipes. The same weather forecast that underestimated our snow by about 80% also failed to inform us that it was going to be single digits at night. Ah, the joys of trailer living. Tuesday and Wednesday were snow days. It took a lot of shoveling by the crew just to get the vehicles out, not to mention clearing a path for the ATVs to get out (and Huff Sanitation to get in). Thursday we finally got out to two of our three study leks. Kate headed out on snowshoes to get a count of birds on Monument Lek, while Christa, Elena, and Max tackled Chugwater Lek, with Elena and Christa trying to get close up video of female behavior for Anna’s projects.

Chugwater Lek proved to be an exciting place. There were at least nine matings, suggesting that the weather had caused some nest failures, and some of the females were looking to re-mate and try to nest again (or alternatively, the snow kept the females away, causing a build-up of receptive females that we happened to catch on our first day back). Second, the guy doing almost all of the matings turned out to be the guy we captured and banded the morning before the snowstorm. Male number 335 (also called ‘Mufasa’), with green and white bands, left our care in very good shape- all his tail feathers, etc. When Elena didn’t see his distinctive tail feather pattern (‘buttprint’) on the morning after capture, we were hopeful that we had gotten the top guy on the lek. In previous years we’ve done a lot of our capture at the end of the season when males were about to pack it in for the year anyway, and often haven’t seen them come back to the lek until the next year. It’s nice to see a released bird not only return, but obviously still be top dog even after a day or two away from the game.

By Friday the crew was back at all three leks. Unfortunately there’s another storm on the horizon for Monday. It’s only supposed to dump 3 inches or so, but that’s pretty much what they said last time. In the mean time, all that snow is melting, and we’re going to be dealing with some of the worst mud we’ve seen all season. Keep your fingers crossed!

<Note- I’ll throw a few more photos up next time I’m in town- the photo uploader hasn’t been working well this morning>

What’s on the menu?

Posted on by
Reply

Monument Draw, between our camp and one of our leks. Sagebrush is definitely the dominant plant out here!

Our focus in our Sage-Grouse research has been fairly limited to the lek– this is still keeping us busy even after many years of study! However, it’s always nice to get a more comprehensive view of the ecology of whatever organism you are studying, and towards that end, we have initiated a collaboration with Dr. Jennifer Forbey from Boise State University. For the Sage-Grouse, their life revolves around the sage plants (genus Artemesia) that form most of their diet, especially in the fall and winter. Jen spent a few days with us a the end of March to see our site, tell us about her research on the interaction between sage and the animals that depend on it, and plan out the first steps in our research together.

What at first seems like a uniform world of “sage” out here turns out to be a variable landscape of food quality for the grouse. First of all there are different species of Artemesia. In our site we have at least two, the basin big sage and Wyoming big sage. These are usually pretty distinguishable, although sometimes smaller Basin plants can look like larger Wyoming plants. The leaves are usually pretty different though, as Jen demonstrated. Jen gave us a handy rule of thumb for this: you can remember the Wyoming sage is like a Wyoming native giving the middle finger to the Californians! We got a laugh out of that.

Sage-Grouse usually cut all but the base of the leaf.

Jen showed us how to distinguish foraging by different herbivores in the area. The grouse tend to pick just the leaves, so if you have a sharp eye you can find the remaining leaf base. Old foraging will show a brown scar in the middle of the leaf, but if you happen to find a place where they have been foraging during the past day or two it will be bright green. Rabbits, on the other hand, tend to cut the entire stem off in a neat angled cut. They harvest the leafy parts before the sage can mount an defense (see below).

Neat diagonal cut = rabbit

Sage stems harvested by rabbits.

The sage are full of all sorts of secondary chemicals such as phenols and terpenes, making them pretty unpalatable to most animals. Jen had us taste a leaf and those little things pack a punch, leaving a persistent bitter taste in our mouths.

The Sage-Grouse obviously have a way around this since they eat almost nothing but sage for months out of the year. One adaptation is a specialized gut with two large caeca (blind pouches coming off the intestine). These are places where bacteria can work their magic and help detoxify and digest the sage. On the lek you’ll often find a dark, gooey tar-like caecal casts left by the grouse, which look very different from their normal (goose-like) poop. I can’t believe I don’t have a photo at hand to show this!

It gets more interesting when you look at variation among plants of a species. While the Sage-Grouse can eat the sage, Jen’s work has shown they prefer to feed off of plants that have less of these secondary chemical compounds. Eating bad quality sage with too high a concentration of these means the grouse have to work harder at digesting for fewer nutrient rewards.

The sage plants themselves are not passive players in this. When something starts to damage the leaves of a sage plant, it will begin to produce more of these defensive chemicals. Even more impressive- as the volatile compounds reach the air, they can spread to nearby plants, causing neighboring bushes to ramp up their production of chemicals as well. What this means is that the longer Sage-Grouse spend foraging in a given patch of sage, the lower quality the food becomes.

Male sage-grouse leaves the lek

Male sage-grouse flying.

This chemical response by the sage may solve a mystery stemming from a 1980’s study of sage-grouse behavior from the Mono Basin in California. Sandy Vehrencamp and colleagues followed radio-tagged males and found that the “good” males (with high energy reserves) were actually traveling farther from the lek, while the males with poor reserves foraged close to the lek. It could be that the plants near the lek tend to build up more of these secondary compounds, so males that can travel farther may actually encounter better areas in which to feed. We hope to follow up on this possibility as we learn more about the way that off-lek foraging behavior interacts with on-lek courtship and performance.